|
|
| How to choose a resort - Type
|
 |
| Purpose-built accommodation. |
|
|
|
In Europe, the debate tends to resolve itself into charm versus functionalism, although in recent years the borders have started to blur. As the older resorts rationalize their lift systems and some of the newer resorts revert to wood-clad traditional architecture, differences may not be so significant in future.
The earliest ski villages were places like Zermatt and Chamonix, renowned for mountaineering before skiing became fashionable. Built at or below the tree-line - around 1800-2000m (5900-6560ft) in Europe - many of these resorts still cater for a large non-skiing clientèle, with jewellery shops, fur coats and matching prices.
|
|
|
During the sixties and seventies, resorts such as Avoriaz, Tignes or Les Menuires were purpose-built to cater for mass market skiing.
Their high-rise architecture does not appeal to everyone, but they are well located
for excellent skiing and you can usually ski to your door.
In North America, the diversity of villages is much more limited. Some resorts,
such as Aspen or Jackson Hole, have a certain character, but none can approach
the best of European chic. Instead they offer convenience, with good facilities,
cheap food and a healthy, unpretentious nightlife. Note that to enjoy many ski
areas, a car is indispensable.
|
|
|
 |
| Traditional accommodation. |
|
| Another consideration when choosing a resort is the location. How far is the
resort from the airport? Is it worth flying across the Atlantic for just a week,
when you may spend the first day travelling and the next two being jet-lagged?
If going by car, can you park in the resort? Increasing numbers of resorts,such
as Wengen and Zermatt, are car-free. |
|
|
|
Add to favourites
Make snow-line my homepage